From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m97LCqIU026115 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:12:54 -0700 Message-ID: <48EBD12B.6090504@thebarn.com> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:14:19 -0500 From: Russell Cattelan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: TAKE 957103 - Merge up to 2.6.27-rc8 References: <20081003031258.7886658C52B4@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20081003091001.GA11627@infradead.org> <20081003195141.GA18988@infradead.org> <48E96C6B.7000009@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <48E96C6B.7000009@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: lachlan@sgi.com Cc: Christoph Hellwig , sgi.bugs.xfs@engr.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 05:10:01AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> So this patch now has made it out to the CVS on oss, but not the actual >>> update of the surrouding kernel tree. Any chance to fix that before >>> the >>> weekend so we'll actually have a tree the builds? >> >> Ok, everything is fine now. Looks like the ptools to cvs push being >> fragile as usual.. > > Both changes (ie fs/xfs and everything else) went in at the same time. > Probably just ptools congestion. > In terms of ptools the xfs tree and the kernel tree are different "isms" and therefore are synced up separately from AU to CA via the nirvana script, so who knows what odd timing might have happened with the whole process. -Russell