From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m990Dxtg011384 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 17:14:00 -0700 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6CCFA4D0146 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 17:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [64.81.245.74]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id t5aDvdUaHGg7tXNT for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48ED4D24.8020208@tlinx.org> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:15:32 -0700 From: Linda Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfsaild centisecs /proc wakeup control? References: <48ED0DA9.7070002@tlinx.org> <48ED1BD8.60309@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <48ED1BD8.60309@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss Eric Sandeen wrote: > On what kernel? 2.6.26.0 (haven't rebooted to 2.6.26.5 yet) > As far as the wakeups go, I thought this was fixed; see for example: > TAKE 977545 - xfsaild causing too many wakeups --- It may be fixed in a newer kernel...(referring to David's later comment).. Just looked at it with powertop 1.10: Wakeups-from-idle per second : 7.1 interval: 10.0s Top causes for wakeups: 42.9% ( 6.0) xfsaild : schedule_timeout (process_timeout) 14.3% ( 2.0) : clocksource_register (clocksource_watchdog) 8.6% ( 1.2) xfsbufd : schedule_timeout (process_timeout) 7.1% ( 1.0) ip : tg3_open (tg3_timer)