From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9F38Zga015464
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:08:36 -0700
Message-ID: <48F55F17.1020800@thebarn.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:10:15 -0500
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: TAKE 988141 - Fix build error - use VFS_I() to access linux	inode
 from xfs inode
References: <20081015021055.6B76358FA1E9@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20081015022106.GA22939@infradead.org> <48F563E1.4050909@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <48F563E1.4050909@sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: markgw@sgi.com
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

Mark Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> FYI I sent this patch out first on 22nd of August, and pinged it on 29th
>> of Semptember..
>
> Thus is why we need something like 'patchworks' hooked into the xfs@oss
> list - better tracking of patch submissions and their status.
So what is patchworks?

>
> Cheers
> -- Mark
>