From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.sgi.com (netops-testserver-3.corp.sgi.com [192.26.57.72]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9F6o5QV016989 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:50:06 -0700 Message-ID: <48F5A104.5060506@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:51:32 +1000 From: Peter Leckie MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: crash with latest code drop. References: <48F54C20.8060704@sgi.com> <20081015011857.GS10716@disturbed> <20081015022948.GA20966@infradead.org> <20081015031645.GA25906@disturbed> <20081015032431.GA7426@infradead.org> <20081015035116.GB25906@disturbed> <48F584B8.8060907@sgi.com> <20081015061917.GC25906@disturbed> In-Reply-To: <20081015061917.GC25906@disturbed> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Dave Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:50:48PM +1000, Peter Leckie wrote: > >> Dave Chinner wrote: >> >>> Update below. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dave. >>> >>> >> The original patch appeared to fix the issue, however the latest one >> Oops as follows: >> > > Well, I think the problem dhould be obvious Gee thanks Dave. > - it's the same as > the first report - deferencing the linux inode without first having > a refernce on it. > Yes it resolves the issue. Pete