public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] dax: add recovery_write to dax_iomap_iter in failure path
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 22:18:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48bbf3e1-0eeb-5a77-44c7-20d0cfdb8338@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfqKoZ79CqvW8eLq@infradead.org>

On 2/2/2022 5:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:31:49PM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
>> +typedef size_t (*iter_func_t)(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
>> +		void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i);
>>   static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iomi,
>>   		struct iov_iter *iter)
>>   {
>> @@ -1210,6 +1212,7 @@ static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iomi,
>>   	ssize_t ret = 0;
>>   	size_t xfer;
>>   	int id;
>> +	iter_func_t write_func = dax_copy_from_iter;
> 
> This use of a function pointer causes indirect call overhead.  A simple
> "bool in_recovery" or do_recovery does the trick in a way that is
> both more readable and generates faster code.

Good point, thanks!

> 
>> +		if ((map_len == -EIO) && (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)) {
> 
> No need for the braces.

Did you mean the outer "( )" ?

> 
>>   		if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
>> -			xfer = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>> -					map_len, iter);
>> +			xfer = write_func(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr, map_len, iter);
>>   		else
>>   			xfer = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>>   					map_len, iter);
> 
> i.e.
> 
> 		if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ)
> 			xfer = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
> 					map_len, iter);
> 		else if (unlikely(do_recovery))
> 			xfer = dax_recovery_write(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
> 					map_len, iter);
> 		else
> 			xfer = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
> 					map_len, iter);
> 

Will do.

Thanks a lot!

-jane

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28 21:31 [PATCH v5 0/7] DAX poison recovery Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] mce: fix set_mce_nospec to always unmap the whole page Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:20     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-02 23:07       ` Jane Chu
2022-02-03 13:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-04  5:23           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:30             ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dax: introduce dax device flag DAXDEV_RECOVERY Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:27     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-03 13:43       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-04  5:17         ` Dan Williams
2022-02-04  5:32           ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:29             ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] dm: make dm aware of target's DAXDEV_RECOVERY capability Jane Chu
2022-02-04  5:34   ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:27     ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] dax: add dax_recovery_write to dax_op and dm target type Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:03     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-04  6:03   ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:25     ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] pmem: add pmem_recovery_write() dax op Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:13     ` Jane Chu
2022-02-04  6:21   ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06  8:08     ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] dax: add recovery_write to dax_iomap_iter in failure path Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:18     ` Jane Chu [this message]
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] pmem: fix pmem_do_write() avoid writing to 'np' page Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:31     ` Jane Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48bbf3e1-0eeb-5a77-44c7-20d0cfdb8338@oracle.com \
    --to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox