From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] dax: add recovery_write to dax_iomap_iter in failure path
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 22:18:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48bbf3e1-0eeb-5a77-44c7-20d0cfdb8338@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfqKoZ79CqvW8eLq@infradead.org>
On 2/2/2022 5:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:31:49PM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
>> +typedef size_t (*iter_func_t)(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
>> + void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i);
>> static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iomi,
>> struct iov_iter *iter)
>> {
>> @@ -1210,6 +1212,7 @@ static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iomi,
>> ssize_t ret = 0;
>> size_t xfer;
>> int id;
>> + iter_func_t write_func = dax_copy_from_iter;
>
> This use of a function pointer causes indirect call overhead. A simple
> "bool in_recovery" or do_recovery does the trick in a way that is
> both more readable and generates faster code.
Good point, thanks!
>
>> + if ((map_len == -EIO) && (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)) {
>
> No need for the braces.
Did you mean the outer "( )" ?
>
>> if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
>> - xfer = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>> - map_len, iter);
>> + xfer = write_func(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr, map_len, iter);
>> else
>> xfer = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>> map_len, iter);
>
> i.e.
>
> if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ)
> xfer = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
> map_len, iter);
> else if (unlikely(do_recovery))
> xfer = dax_recovery_write(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
> map_len, iter);
> else
> xfer = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
> map_len, iter);
>
Will do.
Thanks a lot!
-jane
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-28 21:31 [PATCH v5 0/7] DAX poison recovery Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] mce: fix set_mce_nospec to always unmap the whole page Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:20 ` Jane Chu
2022-02-02 23:07 ` Jane Chu
2022-02-03 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-04 5:23 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06 8:30 ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dax: introduce dax device flag DAXDEV_RECOVERY Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:27 ` Jane Chu
2022-02-03 13:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-04 5:17 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-04 5:32 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06 8:29 ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] dm: make dm aware of target's DAXDEV_RECOVERY capability Jane Chu
2022-02-04 5:34 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06 8:27 ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] dax: add dax_recovery_write to dax_op and dm target type Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:03 ` Jane Chu
2022-02-04 6:03 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06 8:25 ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] pmem: add pmem_recovery_write() dax op Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:13 ` Jane Chu
2022-02-04 6:21 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-06 8:08 ` Jane Chu
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] dax: add recovery_write to dax_iomap_iter in failure path Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 22:18 ` Jane Chu [this message]
2022-01-28 21:31 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] pmem: fix pmem_do_write() avoid writing to 'np' page Jane Chu
2022-02-02 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 21:31 ` Jane Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48bbf3e1-0eeb-5a77-44c7-20d0cfdb8338@oracle.com \
--to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox