From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
To: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: deadlock with latest xfs
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:46:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49018B66.9050608@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081024052418.GO25906@disturbed>
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 01:08:55PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:17:30PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
>>>> another problem with latest xfs
>>> Is this with the 2.6.27-based ptools/cvs tree or with the 2.6.28 based
>>> git tree? It does looks more like a VM issue than a XFS issue to me.
>>>
>> It's with the 2.6.27-rc8 based ptools tree. Prior to checking
>> in these patches:
>>
>> Can't lock inodes in radix tree preload region
>> stop using xfs_itobp in xfs_bulkstat
>> free partially initialized inodes using destroy_inode
>>
>> I was able to stress a system for about 4 hours before it ran out
>> of memory. Now I hit the deadlock within a few minutes. I need
>> to roll back to find which patch changed the behaviour.
>
> Does it go away when you add the "XFS: Fix race when looking up
> reclaimable inodes" I sent this morning?
I haven't had a chance to test it yet - will do that on Monday.
>
> Also, is there a thread stuck in xfs_setfilesize() waiting on an
> ilock during I/O completion?
Haven't seen one but then I haven't looked through all 1024 stuck
threads.
>
> i.e. did the log hang because I/O completion is stuck waiting on
> an ilock that is held by a thread waiting on I/O completion?
It could be. I was hoping that if I found the offending mod it
would be easier to find out what caused the problem. I pulled
out each of the changes listed above in turn and I can still hit
the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 9:17 deadlock with latest xfs Lachlan McIlroy
2008-10-23 20:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-23 22:28 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-24 3:08 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2008-10-24 5:24 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-24 6:48 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-26 0:53 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-26 2:50 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-26 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-27 1:42 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2008-10-27 5:30 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-27 6:29 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2008-10-27 6:54 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-27 7:31 ` Lachlan McIlroy
[not found] ` <200810281702.17135.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
2008-10-28 6:25 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-24 8:46 ` Lachlan McIlroy [this message]
2008-10-26 22:39 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-27 2:30 ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-10-27 5:47 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-27 7:33 ` Lachlan McIlroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49018B66.9050608@sgi.com \
--to=lachlan@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox