From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9SLcBBJ001222 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:38:12 -0700 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CEEDA55556B for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 23HD9sNuay0gSmuc for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9SLc8YP009017 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:38:09 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9SLc8mt026768 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:38:08 -0400 Received: from neon.msp.redhat.com (neon.msp.redhat.com [10.15.80.10]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9SLc72H006962 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:38:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4907863F.3030005@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:38:07 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] hook xfs to fiemap ioctl References: <4904E0DE.3040902@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4904E0DE.3040902@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs-oss Eric Sandeen wrote: > v2: Update & resend, including some checkpatch fixes, a bugfix, and > incorporating some of Christoph's and Dave's comments. > > v3: Address more review comments, and split into 3 patches this time. > > Also, here's a very hacky (don't laugh!) test app. I'll clean it > up at some point :) > > -Eric > Apologies, I'm going to have to send at least one more round. I left out the bit where the fiemap interface lets you pass in just the header, and no array for extents information, to simply get back an extent count. I have a fix for that, will send later tonight. Is there any chance of this making .28 still? :) -Eric