From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9SNg3Be014002 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:42:03 -0700 Received: from sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EAC8B12AF538 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 4PKh7rORJgjpEL6D for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4907A34A.1060407@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:42:02 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oss.sgi.com and mailman, looking for volunteers. References: <490720DD.2050502@thebarn.com> <20081028215031.GY4985@disturbed> <20081028223053.GA458@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20081028223053.GA458@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Russell Cattelan , xfs-oss Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >> What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and >> we can forget about all these problems.... > > Yeah. ecartis is just part of the problem. barracuda is another at > least as big problem, and I guess there are many other hiding. I suppose that this is sgi's decision in the end ;) Any comment from those folks? -Eric