From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [192.26.58.214]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9T1IfYN020501 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:18:41 -0700 Message-ID: <4907B9E4.8090609@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:18:28 +1100 From: Mark Goodwin Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oss.sgi.com and mailman, looking for volunteers. References: <490720DD.2050502@thebarn.com> <20081028215031.GY4985@disturbed> <20081028223053.GA458@infradead.org> <4907B631.1090205@xfs.org> In-Reply-To: <4907B631.1090205@xfs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Russell Cattelan Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-oss Russell Cattelan wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:50:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >> >>> What is the point? Let's just move the list to vger.kernel.org and >>> we can forget about all these problems.... >>> >> >> Yeah. ecartis is just part of the problem. barracuda is another at >> least as big problem, and I guess there are many other hiding. >> >> > ya it has dropped 39 messages this month > oss[5:59pm]#formail -x Subject: -s < xfs.2008-10 |wc -l > 741 > oss[5:59pm]#formail -x Subject: -s < xfs-procmail-2008_10 | wc -l > 780 > > > I think using mailman will clear up the dropped mail problems. > > What other issues do you think is there? I will reply later today on this > > The barracuda problem is outside of oss and affects all mail from 1st.de > to sgi. all mail to any list @sgi.com goes thru the internal barracuda spam filter. > > Did you ever find out why barracuda thinks your ip has a "poor" rating? > Christoph's IP has now been whitelisted (or should have been by now). I have no insight as to which other IP addresses have a poor rating, there may be others (that are not spammers). -- Mark