From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:56:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.sgi.com (netops-testserver-3.corp.sgi.com [192.26.57.72]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mA51uQbh026788 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:56:26 -0800 Message-ID: <4910FCF8.5080802@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:55:04 +1100 From: Lachlan McIlroy Reply-To: lachlan@sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.28 References: <20081031045737.ECE0E58AE1E9@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Steven Noonan Cc: david@lang.hm, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Steven Noonan wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:02 PM, wrote: >> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: >> >>> The following changes since commit >>> 721d5dfe7e516954c501d5e9d0dfab379cf4241a: >>> Linus Torvalds (1): >>> Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://neil.brown.name/md >> I am a fairly heavy user of XFS and am as eager as anyone to see cleanups >> and improvements, but 102 commits to go into -rc3???? >> >> David Lang >> > > I'm pretty sure these won't be accepted until 2.6.29's merge window > opens. The merge window for 2.6.28 has closed, and due to the sheer > number of commits, at least -one- is bound to cause a regression. Okay, that's fine. The tree was too unstable to request a pull any earlier and we're still chasing some issues. We should be well and truly ready for 2.6.29. > > - Steven > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >