From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
	mADLWGC9020666 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:32:18 -0800
Received: from slurp.thebarn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 700C81565B02
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:32:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slurp.thebarn.com (cattelan-host202.dsl.visi.com
	[208.42.117.202]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id
	CZMqdXgTykBrV1LU for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:32:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from funky.thebarn.com (slurp.thebarn.com [208.42.117.201])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by slurp.thebarn.com (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mADJX8X5007425;
	Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:33:08 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from cattelan@xfs.org)
Message-ID: <491C80F4.5070405@xfs.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:33:08 -0600
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [xfs] xfs list converted to mailman
References: <491BAF9F.70901@xfs.org> <20081113154255.GA9580@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081113154255.GA9580@infradead.org>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:39:59PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
>   
>> Test email to verify thing are working correctly.
>>
>> User management at:
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo
>>     
>
> Can you please kill these stupid [xfs] prefixes it adds to the subect
> line?
>
>   
ok done...

the correct term should be "subject challenged" not stupid :-)

-Russell


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs