From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mALIX1qW032187 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:33:01 -0600 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 30FE915BF048 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:33:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LiqPJpRx1J8FDyz5 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:33:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4926F885.8010905@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:05:57 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix spurious gcc warnings References: <20081112114738.GC15216@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20081112114738.GC15216@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Some recent gcc warnings don't like passing string variables to > printf-like functions without using at least a "%s" format string. > Chaneg the two occurances of that in xfs to please gcc. Looks fine to me (might re-spell "Chaneg" though ;) ) -Eric > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c: In function "xfs_read_xfssta": > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c:64: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c: In function "init_xfs_fs": > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c:1833: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments > > Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c 2008-11-12 11:12:49.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.c 2008-11-12 11:13:05.000000000 +0100 > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ xfs_read_xfsstats( > > /* Loop over all stats groups */ > for (i=j=len = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(xstats); i++) { > - len += sprintf(buffer + len, xstats[i].desc); > + len += sprintf(buffer + len, "%s", xstats[i].desc); > /* inner loop does each group */ > while (j < xstats[i].endpoint) { > val = 0; > Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c 2008-11-12 11:13:11.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c 2008-11-12 11:13:43.000000000 +0100 > @@ -1827,10 +1827,9 @@ STATIC int __init > init_xfs_fs(void) > { > int error; > - static char message[] __initdata = KERN_INFO \ > - XFS_VERSION_STRING " with " XFS_BUILD_OPTIONS " enabled\n"; > > - printk(message); > + printk(KERN_INFO XFS_VERSION_STRING " with " > + XFS_BUILD_OPTIONS " enabled\n"); > > ktrace_init(64); > vn_init(); > > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs