From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mAPLh69K008811 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:43:06 -0600 Message-ID: <492C7160.80208@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:42:56 +1100 From: Mark Goodwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com References: <492BA7AD.5080007@sgi.com> <20081125081644.GA20644@infradead.org> <492C0B3D.3040002@thebarn.com> In-Reply-To: <492C0B3D.3040002@thebarn.com> Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Russell Cattelan Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Russell Cattelan wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 06:22:21PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: >> >>> There's a few branches there already: >>> >>> 'master' This will contain all the latest xfs changes not yet pushed >>> to mainline. >>> 'mainline' This is vanilla mainline and will updated regularly. >>> 'for-linus' Our staging branch for pull requests >>> 'xfs-dev' This branch will contain KDB and other supporting code for >>> development and should be identical to the old CVS tree. >>> >>> Feel free to start using it and let us know if you have any issues. >>> >> Any chance to have these as separate git trees instead of branches? Why? Is it just a bandwidth issue with the initial clone, or some other reason? >> In either case, do you expect patches against the xfs-dev or the master >> tree? I'll let Lachlan reply to that, but normally master I think. One thing that is important is that any commit against the xfs-dev tree should split out kdb and dmapi changes into separate commits from changes to fs/xfs. > It would also be useful if the trees and which one to be used >> could be documented on oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs or xfs.org. yes certainly. > Specifically this page please. > http://xfs.org/index.php/Getting_the_latest_source_code Been waiting for the WIKI on oss to be set up - these two sites can simply mirror each other I guess for some or all documentation. > Maybe add a quick tutorial on git branches and how to create tracking > branches for this tree. Yes that's a good idea: git remote add .... > Also can we have something other than "unnamed repository" in the > description file? Yep. Niv, can you fix that up please. > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs Russell, would it be possible somehow for this footer to include the URL of the archive reference for the message containing it? Cheers -- Mark _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs