From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB934P1o019990 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:04:25 -0600 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 335DA8F8081 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [134.14.55.22] (dhcp22.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.22]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA29389 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:04:17 +1100 Message-ID: <493DE01B.6050303@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:03:55 +1100 From: Mark Goodwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: What's left for 2.6.29? Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-oss I think we need to freeze and start testing, i.e. git-cherry from the master branch over to for-linus and start some soak, stress amd regression testing. What's still left? Outstanding reviews? Dave, ...? Cheers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs