From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mBMKYZ0o025293 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:34:36 -0600 Message-ID: <494FF9B3.9030103@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:33:55 +1100 From: Mark Goodwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] xfs-cmds staging tree References: <20081222163831.755809000@bombadil.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20081222163831.755809000@bombadil.infradead.org> Reply-To: markgw@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This is the staging tree of xfs patches. Given that Barry is gone now it seem > like no one cares about userspace and I'll play patch monkey for now. Thanks Christoph. Lachlan and I were just discussing yesterday that it's time to set up a git repository for xfs-cmds on oss. This would contain all the userspace stuff: attr, acl, xfsprogs, dmapi, xfsdump and xfstests. Anyone have a reason not to keep all of this together in the one tree? I guess we'd need branches for 'master' (aka dev) and 'stable' or something ..? Cheers -- Mark _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs