From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mBT5nrwm032485 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:49:53 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id BF9BD1792328 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nbes8iaLUGjFk8B5 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:49:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <495864E1.9070403@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:49:21 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS corruption on ARM References: <20081228123305.GE30805@themel.com> <20081229002851.GD22525@disturbed> In-Reply-To: <20081229002851.GD22525@disturbed> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Thomas Themel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Dave Chinner wrote: > [CC'd the xfs list.] > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 01:33:05PM +0100, Thomas Themel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> there was a thread[0] on this list in 2008-10 about XFS corrupting >> rather quickly on recent ARM kernels, which seems to have petered out >> without any apparent results. I'm still seeing the same problems with >> 2.6.28, and I suspect that this qualifies as a kind of regression >> (though ancient), since the devices I'm running this on (Buffalo >> LinkStations) originally ship with a (vendor-modified) 2.6.16 kernel, >> where XFS seems to be working. >> >> Is this still on anyone's radar? I'm willing to test proposed fixes and >> supply data[1], but lack any deep knowledge of either ARM or XFS internals. >> >> (Please Cc: me, I'm not on the list.) could be related to http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=755 -Eric >> [0] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/382 >> [1] Though mine doesn't look any different from what was posted in [0] >> to the little-trained eye. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs