From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nATM7Lcb106509 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:07:22 -0600 Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 25809BD982 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id jflyfTEJEuMGk5XI for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:07:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:07:42 +1100 (EST) From: Nathan Scott Message-ID: <496342044.752741259532462073.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: <20091127150759.GA10145@infradead.org> Subject: Re: xfsdump debian package generation MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com ----- "Christoph Hellwig" wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > it seems like xfsdump doesn't have the hardlink based debian package > generation yet. I was just looking at porting over all recent build > system improvement in xfsprogs and wondered if that was intentional. > > If possible I'd like to keep the two build systems as close as > possible. Not intentionally different, I just didn't get to it yet. cheers. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs