public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: aluno <aluno3@poczta.onet.pl>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_db problem
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:43:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4964BF7E.6060906@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4964BD79.20806@poczta.onet.pl>

aluno wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Recently we've noticed that xfs_admin (xfs_db ver. 2.10.2) causes
> segfault or FP traps while trying
> to use following command on FAT partition:
> 
> # xfs_admin -u /dev/sda1
> xfs_admin: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0xeb58906d
> Floating point exception
> 
> and then makes error in dmesg:
> 
> xfs_db[10385] trap divide error ip:80b32b0 sp:fffbd900 error:0 in
> xfs_db[8048000+7f000]
> 
> We know that xfs_admin is dedicated tool for XFS only not for FAT or
> other filesystems,
> but we would like to have xfs_db which will be able to cope with non-xfs
> filesystems also.
> 
> After some investigations we've found some place and put there exit(1) -
> in xfsprogs-2.10.2/db/init.c
> 
> in init() procedure:
> 
>     (...)
>         sbp = &xmount.m_sb;
>         if (sbp->sb_magicnum != XFS_SB_MAGIC) {
>                 fprintf(stderr, _("%s: unexpected XFS SB magic number
> 0x%08x\n"),
>                         progname, sbp->sb_magicnum);
>                 exit(1);
>         }
>     (...)
> 
> 
> 
> Is it the right way to fix this problem?

The thing is, xfs_db could in theory be used to *fix* the bad magic
number, so refusing to continue might be a problem.  But perhaps when
invoked as xfs_admin, it should just bail out.  It would be interesting
to find where the actual failure is, though...

FWIW, I see a slightly different failure on a 128M vfat fs:

[root@host tmp]# file fsfile
fsfile: x86 boot sector, mkdosfs boot message display
[root@host tmp]# xfs_admin -u fsfile
xfs_admin: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0xeb3c906d
xfs_admin: size check failed
xfs_admin: failed to alloc 20875030464 bytes: Cannot allocate memory

It probably depends on the details of the (non-xfs) filesystem it's
pointed at.

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-07 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-07 14:34 xfs_db problem aluno
2009-01-07 14:43 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-01-07 17:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-07 14:37 aluno3

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4964BF7E.6060906@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=aluno3@poczta.onet.pl \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox