public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add test 200, exercise read-only block devices and mounts
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:32:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <496905C9.10807@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090104174223.GA10050@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Make sure we do the right thing with blockdevices with a hard read-only
> flag.

Looks good to me.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> Index: xfstests-dev/200
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ xfstests-dev/200	2009-01-04 17:39:08.000000000 +0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
> +#! /bin/sh
> +# FS QA Test No. 200
> +#
> +# Check out various mount/remount/unmount scenarious on a read-only blockdev.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2009 Christoph Hellwig.
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +# creator
> +owner=hch@lst.de
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +
> +_filter_scratch()
> +{
> +	sed -e "s,$SCRATCH_DEV,SCRATCH_DEV,g" | \
> +		sed -e "s,$SCRATCH_MNT,SCRATCH_MNT,g"
> +}
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	cd /
> +	blockdev --setrw $SCRATCH_DEV
> +}
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common.rc
> +. ./common.filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null 2>&1
> +
> +#
> +# Mark the device read-only
> +#
> +echo "setting device read-only"
> +blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +#
> +# Mount it, and make sure we can't write to it, and we can unmount it again
> +#
> +echo "mounting read-only block device:"
> +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +echo "touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)"
> +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +#
> +# Apparently this used to be broken at some point:
> +#	http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=807
> +#
> +echo "unmounting read-only filesystem"
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +echo "setting device read-write"
> +blockdev --setrw $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +echo "mounting read-write block device:"
> +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +echo "touch files"
> +touch $SCRATCH_MNT/{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
> +
> +echo "going down:"
> +src/godown -f $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +echo "unmounting shutdown filesystem:"
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +echo "setting device read-only"
> +blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +#
> +# Mounting a filesystem that requires log-recovery fails unless
> +# -o norecovery is used.
> +#
> +echo "mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device:"
> +_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +echo "unmounting read-only filesystem"
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +#
> +# This is the way out if the underlying device really is read-only.
> +# Doesn't mean it's a good idea in practive, more a last resort
> +# data recovery hack.
> +#
> +echo "mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device:"
> +_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +echo "unmounting read-only filesystem"
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +echo "setting device read-write"
> +blockdev --setrw $SCRATCH_DEV
> +
> +#
> +# But log recovery is performed when mount with -o ro as long as
> +# the underlying device is not write protected.
> +#
> +echo "mounting filesystem that needs recovery with -o ro:"
> +_scratch_mount -o ro 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo "*** done"
> +rm -f $seq.full
> +status=0
> Index: xfstests-dev/200.out
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ xfstests-dev/200.out	2009-01-04 17:39:38.000000000 +0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +QA output created by 200
> +setting device read-only
> +mounting read-only block device:
> +mount: block device SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
> +touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)
> +touch: cannot touch `SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system
> +unmounting read-only filesystem
> +setting device read-write
> +mounting read-write block device:
> +touch files
> +going down:
> +unmounting shutdown filesystem:
> +setting device read-only
> +mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device:
> +mount: block device SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
> +mount: cannot mount block device SCRATCH_DEV read-only
> +unmounting read-only filesystem
> +umount: SCRATCH_MNT: not mounted
> +mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device:
> +mount: block device SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
> +unmounting read-only filesystem
> +setting device read-write
> +mounting filesystem that needs recovery with -o ro:
> +*** done
> Index: xfstests-dev/group
> ===================================================================
> --- xfstests-dev.orig/group	2009-01-04 17:14:27.000000000 +0000
> +++ xfstests-dev/group	2009-01-04 17:14:36.000000000 +0000
> @@ -301,3 +301,4 @@
>  196 quota auto
>  197 dir auto
>  199 mount auto
> +200 mount auto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2009-01-10 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-04 17:42 [PATCH] xfstests: add test 200, exercise read-only block devices and mounts Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-10 20:32 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=496905C9.10807@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox