* [PATCH] xfstests: only run 197 on 32-bit machines
@ 2009-01-15 2:08 Eric Sandeen
2009-01-15 5:14 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-01-18 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-01-15 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-oss; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Don't run test 197 on 64-bit machines
If it always passes on 64 bits, this gives a false
sense of security. Make it obvious.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
--
diff --git a/197 b/197
index 4c81941..f77bfa2 100644
--- a/197
+++ b/197
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
_supported_fs xfs
_supported_os Linux
+bitsperlong=`src/feature -w`
+if [ "$bitsperlong" -ne 32 ]; then
+ _notrun "This test is only valid on 32 bit machines"
+fi
mkdir $TEST_DIR/ttt
for n in {1..168}; do
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: only run 197 on 32-bit machines
2009-01-15 2:08 [PATCH] xfstests: only run 197 on 32-bit machines Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-01-15 5:14 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-01-18 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Felix Blyakher @ 2009-01-15 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs-oss
On Jan 14, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Don't run test 197 on 64-bit machines
>
> If it always passes on 64 bits, this gives a false
> sense of security. Make it obvious.
Sounds reasonable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>
> --
>
> diff --git a/197 b/197
> index 4c81941..f77bfa2 100644
> --- a/197
> +++ b/197
> @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> _supported_fs xfs
> _supported_os Linux
>
> +bitsperlong=`src/feature -w`
> +if [ "$bitsperlong" -ne 32 ]; then
> + _notrun "This test is only valid on 32 bit machines"
> +fi
>
> mkdir $TEST_DIR/ttt
> for n in {1..168}; do
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: only run 197 on 32-bit machines
2009-01-15 2:08 [PATCH] xfstests: only run 197 on 32-bit machines Eric Sandeen
2009-01-15 5:14 ` Felix Blyakher
@ 2009-01-18 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-18 19:27 ` Eric Sandeen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2009-01-18 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs-oss
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:08:04PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Don't run test 197 on 64-bit machines
>
> If it always passes on 64 bits, this gives a false
> sense of security. Make it obvious.
I don't think it matters, but your patch looks correct and if it helps
you in some way..
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests: only run 197 on 32-bit machines
2009-01-18 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2009-01-18 19:27 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-01-18 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs-oss
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:08:04PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Don't run test 197 on 64-bit machines
>>
>> If it always passes on 64 bits, this gives a false
>> sense of security. Make it obvious.
>
> I don't think it matters, but your patch looks correct and if it helps
> you in some way..
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
thanks
I only wanted to put it in because I was looking at fedora, wanted to
test it against this bug, ran it, it passed, and *then* I remembered
that it'd only fail on 32-bit, and my test (on that hardware) wasn't
really valid.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-18 19:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-15 2:08 [PATCH] xfstests: only run 197 on 32-bit machines Eric Sandeen
2009-01-15 5:14 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-01-18 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-18 19:27 ` Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox