From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n0KBrQIX009213 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:53:26 -0600 Received: from mail-bw0-f13.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 76787D808B3 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f13.google.com (mail-bw0-f13.google.com [209.85.218.13]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id c3ylhS4eqx4HPJXf for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so89130bwz.20 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:53:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4975B9C4.7030401@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:47:16 +0100 From: Jacek Luczak MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO References: <497468C1.3000001@gmail.com> <4974CA20.6050308@sandeen.net> <20090120004611.GA6445@disturbed> <20090120112910.GA6831@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090120112910.GA6831@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Eric Sandeen , LKML , xfs mailing list Christoph Hellwig pisze: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:46:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> Jacek Luczak wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I've stepped into XFS issue/bug. Yesterday I've compiled 2.6.29-rc2 and no >>>> didn't found errors. Today I've booted my notebook and XFS bug have occurred. >>>> System reboot didn't helped, same error appeared. >>>> >>>> Some info: >>>> [1] config: http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2.config >>>> [2] kernel logs: >>>> http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2_XFS-bug.log >>>> [3] most interesting part of log below. >>> so this happens every mount? Reproducible is good. How large is the >>> filesystem (too large to extract elsewhere for analysis...?) (plus I >>> suppose it'll be hard to get to it when you can't even boot....) >> XFS folks, I suspect the common link between all the reports of this >> bug is that they are on 32-bit kernels. I can't reproduce this on >> a 64 bit kernel, and I'm trying to get a 32-bit UML built right now >> to test this theory. > > I'm doing about half of my testing on 32 bit x86, and I couldn't > reproduce the detailed receipe in the kernel.org bugzilla yet. > > Just curious: do you have CONFIG_LBD set? > Hi Christoph, the answer is: $ grep LBD .config # CONFIG_LBD is not set -Jacek _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs