From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n0L93MWd003073 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:03:23 -0600 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 62BE4A56ED for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Xr6pG3PG58R73T6j for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so1944279mue.2 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:03:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4976E524.1050607@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:04:36 +0100 From: Jacek Luczak MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO References: <4974CA20.6050308@sandeen.net> <20090120004611.GA6445@disturbed> <20090120112910.GA6831@infradead.org> <4975B9C4.7030401@gmail.com> <20090120114906.GA12526@infradead.org> <20090120121335.GA19182@infradead.org> <20090120124515.GA31838@infradead.org> <4975D88B.7020906@gmail.com> <20090120140514.GA2976@infradead.org> <4975DE45.7050004@gmail.com> <20090121040512.GK10158@disturbed> In-Reply-To: <20090121040512.GK10158@disturbed> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jacek Luczak , Christoph Hellwig , Eric Sandeen , LKML , xfs mailing list Dave Chinner pisze: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig pisze: >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:58:35PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote: >>>> Good job! Is there some ,,quick'' fix? >>> The patch below makes it go away for me, alternatively just enable >>> CONFIG_LBD. >>> >>> >>> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_types.h >>> =================================================================== >>> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_types.h 2009-01-20 14:55:55.806068213 +0100 >>> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_types.h 2009-01-20 14:56:01.437945154 +0100 >>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ typedef __uint64_t xfs_dfilblks_t; /* nu >>> /* >>> * Memory based types are conditional. >>> */ >>> -#if XFS_BIG_BLKNOS >>> +#if 1 //XFS_BIG_BLKNOS >>> typedef __uint64_t xfs_fsblock_t; /* blockno in filesystem (agno|agbno) */ >>> typedef __uint64_t xfs_rfsblock_t; /* blockno in filesystem (raw) */ >>> typedef __uint64_t xfs_rtblock_t; /* extent (block) in realtime area */ >>> >> I've applied it and now running ,,fixed'' kernel. What I've notice is: >> $ LC_ALL=C df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/sda1 20G -40E 40E - / >> /dev/sda5 20G -23E 23E - /home >> /dev/sda6 56G 56G 774M 99% /NORA >> /dev/sda7 45G 44G 1.2G 98% /MAGAZYN > > Please try the patch I posted this morning - it fixes the problem > properly and shouldn't have this side effect. > Your patch work for me. I've made also some tests a'la one proposed by Christoph, here also everything works. Good work guys! Have a nice day, -Jacek _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs