From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Nathan Scott <nscott@aconex.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs spec file update
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:21:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497C754C.5090004@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232777667.13684.20.camel@verge.scott.net.au>
Nathan Scott wrote:
> Since binaries have moved between xfsprogs and xfsdump packages
> in version 3.0.0, we need to fix the dependencies in the rpm
> specfiles, else rpm will complain.
>
> While in there, remove xfs-cmds Provides/Obsoletes lines, there
> is no way anyone is ever going to be requiring those anymore (no
> real-world upgrade path having such old skool SGI-released rpms).
Seems fine to me, though before I update Fedora to the next version I'll
probably pass the notion past the true RPM gurus to be sure :)
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> diff --git a/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in b/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in
> index 2826a37..cf61225 100644
> --- a/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in
> +++ b/build/rpm/xfsprogs.spec.in
> @@ -5,10 +5,8 @@ Release: @pkg_release@
> Distribution: @pkg_distribution@
> Packager: Silicon Graphics, Inc. <http://www.sgi.com/>
> BuildRoot: @build_root@
> -Provides: xfs-cmds
> -Obsoletes: xfs-cmds
> Prereq: /sbin/ldconfig
> -Conflicts: xfsdump < 2.0.0
> +Conflicts: xfsdump < 3.0.0
> Source: @pkg_name@-@pkg_version@.src.tar.gz
> License: GPL
> Vendor: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
> @@ -32,8 +30,8 @@ with the IRIX version of XFS.
> %package devel
> Summary: XFS filesystem-specific static libraries and headers.
> Group: Development/Libraries
> -Requires: @pkg_name@ >= 2.0.0
> -Conflicts: @pkg_name@ < 2.0.0
> +Requires: @pkg_name@ >= 3.0.0
> +Conflicts: @pkg_name@ < 3.0.0
>
> %description devel
> xfsprogs-devel contains the libraries and header files needed to
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-25 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-24 6:14 [PATCH] xfsprogs spec file update Nathan Scott
2009-01-25 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-25 14:21 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497C754C.5090004@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=nscott@aconex.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox