From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n0SEsYFd132479 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:54:34 -0600
Received: from slurp.thebarn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2DEB7187A5DD
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slurp.thebarn.com (cattelan-host202.dsl.visi.com
	[208.42.117.202]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id
	bkchEyy2UR9fvh9y for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4980712A.4050500@thebarn.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:52:26 -0600
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: xfs open questions
References: <200901270928.29215@zmi.at>
	<200901280003.30518@zmi.at>	<497FDC16.6050809@thebarn.com>
	<200901280952.26027@zmi.at>
In-Reply-To: <200901280952.26027@zmi.at>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Russell Cattelan wrote:
>   
>> The sig is there, are you saying it's broken somehow?
>> It might have something to do with the html stripper.
>>     
>
> Yes, I use kmail (from KDE) which automatically displays mails with gpg-
> sigs in different colours to easily see if it's correct/trusted/wrong. 
> And on this list, my messages all come with "Invalid Sig".
>   

Well I ran a test email through the test list on oss and it seems to
work fine.

Let try it here then, I'm going to sign this and see if it come back to
me with
a valid sig.

> mfg zmi
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>   

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs