Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Mark Goodwin]

John Hesterberg wrote:
> FYI, this just happened internally:
>
>     ==========================
>     ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAKE)
>     From: mark goodwin <markgw@sgi.com>
>     Date: Feb 04 2009 02:34:02AM
>     ==========================
>
>     add Copyright using Creative Commons Attribute Share Alike license,
>     as approved by the OSRB for release to oss.sgi.com
>     ...
>     xfsdocs/xfs-website/training/docs/xfs_lab_01_build.doc - 1.3 - changed
>     ...
>
> Just wanted you to know this is still in process and not
> forgotten, since I hadn't seen any other communication about it
> since last week.
>

Sorry for the delay - the lawyers were pondering the GNU FDL Vrs the
Creative Commons license (and settled on the latter). So now that's 
resolved,
I've updated the copyrights in the doc sources and put them in a git tree:

	git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git

This repository is XFS group writable on oss.sgi.com. The directory 
structure
corresponds to (a subset of) the internal ptools tree below 
xfs-cmds/xfsdocs.
Since the files in this repository are binary, you'll need to co-ordinate
check-out/check-in to avoid merge failures (git handles binaries but 
can't merge
them). I think Eric and/or others inside Redhat will have the first go 
at it :)
I also regenerated the PDFs and committed them too since they're also 
present
in the internal ptools tree.

Thanks
-- Mark

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Christoph Hellwig]

> Sorry for the delay - the lawyers were pondering the GNU FDL Vrs the
> Creative Commons license (and settled on the latter). So now that's  
> resolved,
> I've updated the copyrights in the doc sources and put them in a git tree:
>
> 	git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git

Russell, can you add this to the list of repositories to be displayed on

	http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi

?

Talking about that any chance you could convert your cvsimport
repositories to bare repos like all the others on oss?  And maybe
move the old xfs-cmds import under cattelan/ like the other cvsimport
ones?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Eric Sandeen]

Mark Goodwin wrote:
> 
> 
> Sorry for the delay - the lawyers were pondering the GNU FDL Vrs the
> Creative Commons license (and settled on the latter). So now that's 
> resolved,
> I've updated the copyrights in the doc sources and put them in a git tree:
> 
> 	git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git
> 
> This repository is XFS group writable on oss.sgi.com. The directory 
> structure
> corresponds to (a subset of) the internal ptools tree below 
> xfs-cmds/xfsdocs.
> Since the files in this repository are binary, you'll need to co-ordinate
> check-out/check-in to avoid merge failures (git handles binaries but 
> can't merge
> them). I think Eric and/or others inside Redhat will have the first go 
> at it :)
> I also regenerated the PDFs and committed them too since they're also 
> present
> in the internal ptools tree.


Mark, John, & SGI - thanks for doing this, getting good docs out under a
license like this should allow them to continue to be relevant living
documents, and will add to the vitality of XFS in the future, I'm sure.
 Now of course I'll need to step up and contribute some updates.  :)

Thanks,

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Russell Cattelan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay - the lawyers were pondering the GNU FDL Vrs the
>> Creative Commons license (and settled on the latter). So now that's 
>> resolved,
>> I've updated the copyrights in the doc sources and put them in a git tree:
>>
>>     git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git
>
> Russell, can you add this to the list of repositories to be displayed on
>
>     http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi
or maybe we should just update the existing xfs-website tree?
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=cattelan/xfs-website/.git;a=summary
>
> ?
>
> Talking about that any chance you could convert your cvsimport
> repositories to bare repos like all the others on oss?  And maybe
> move the old xfs-cmds import under cattelan/ like the other cvsimport
> ones?
>
I moved cvsimported xfs-import dmapi-import and xfs-cmds under archive.

> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJjY8YNRmM+OaGhBgRAk6+AJsGq0ADiAlx72Cty2k6oyGBjdhxLgCfdXEc
CJwYfoMTGJxycuLpCvACU4c=
=81ro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Mark Goodwin]

Russell Cattelan wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ...
>>> I've updated the copyrights in the doc sources and put them in a git tree:
>>>
>>>     git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git
>> Russell, can you add this to the list of repositories to be displayed on
>>
>>     http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi
>
> or maybe we should just update the existing xfs-website tree?
> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=cattelan/xfs-website/.git;a=summary

Rus, I didn't know that tree existed - it now has incorrect copyright
notices for the doc sources. However, since it's ahead of ptools
(and has cvs imported history too), I'll clone it as a replacement
and then merge in the training docs with updated copyrights. It's easier
for SGI if the official tree is git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git
since the directory structure mirrors the internal ptools hierarchy,
along with the other xfs/cmds trees.

>> Talking about that any chance you could convert your cvsimport
>> repositories to bare repos like all the others on oss?  And maybe
>> move the old xfs-cmds import under cattelan/ like the other cvsimport
>> ones?
>>
> I moved cvsimported xfs-import dmapi-import and xfs-cmds under archive.

Thanks for that.

Cheers
-- Mark

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Russell Cattelan]

Mark Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> Russell Cattelan wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> ...
>>>> I've updated the copyrights in the doc sources and put them in a
>>>> git tree:
>>>>
>>>>     git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git
>>> Russell, can you add this to the list of repositories to be
>>> displayed on
>>>
>>>     http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi
>>
>> or maybe we should just update the existing xfs-website tree?
>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=cattelan/xfs-website/.git;a=summary
>>
>
> Rus, I didn't know that tree existed - it now has incorrect copyright
> notices for the doc sources. However, since it's ahead of ptools
> (and has cvs imported history too), I'll clone it as a replacement
> and then merge in the training docs with updated copyrights. It's easier
> for SGI if the official tree is git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git
> since the directory structure mirrors the internal ptools hierarchy,
> along with the other xfs/cmds trees.
That's cool, I'll change the web site to point to the new repo
once you have it fixed up.
Just trying to keep the clutter down.

>
>>> Talking about that any chance you could convert your cvsimport
>>> repositories to bare repos like all the others on oss?  And maybe
>>> move the old xfs-cmds import under cattelan/ like the other cvsimport
>>> ones?
>>>
>> I moved cvsimported xfs-import dmapi-import and xfs-cmds under archive.
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> Cheers
> -- Mark
>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Mark Goodwin]

Russell Cattelan wrote:
> Mark Goodwin wrote:
>> .... I'll clone it as a replacement and then merge in the training
>> docs with updated copyrights. It's easier for SGI if the official
>> tree is git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdocs.git
> That's cool, I'll change the web site to point to the new repo
> once you have it fixed up.
> Just trying to keep the clutter down.

Ok, done

-- Mark

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:07:25PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
>> That's cool, I'll change the web site to point to the new repo
>> once you have it fixed up.
>> Just trying to keep the clutter down.
>
> Ok, done

So now we have the old xfsdocs repo replaced by what essentially be
xfsweb.

I think we should have a clean repo for the document sources somewhere,
not intermindlged with the more or less dead website..

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Eric Sandeen]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:07:25PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
>>> That's cool, I'll change the web site to point to the new repo
>>> once you have it fixed up.
>>> Just trying to keep the clutter down.
>> Ok, done
> 
> So now we have the old xfsdocs repo replaced by what essentially be
> xfsweb.
> 
> I think we should have a clean repo for the document sources somewhere,
> not intermindlged with the more or less dead website..
> 

I agree.

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Mark Goodwin]

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:07:25PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
>>>> That's cool, I'll change the web site to point to the new repo
>>>> once you have it fixed up.
>>>> Just trying to keep the clutter down.
>>> Ok, done
>> So now we have the old xfsdocs repo replaced by what essentially be
>> xfsweb.
>>
>> I think we should have a clean repo for the document sources somewhere,
>> not intermindlged with the more or less dead website..
>>
> 
> I agree.
> 
> -Eric

OK, I put it back how I had it set up originally.

-- Mark

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:35:20AM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> OK, I put it back how I had it set up originally.

Can you keep the website repo as xfs/cmds/xfsweb.git?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation

[Mark Goodwin]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:35:20AM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
>> OK, I put it back how I had it set up originally.
> 
> Can you keep the website repo as xfs/cmds/xfsweb.git?
> 

yes, I left it as xfs/cmds/xfswebsite.git


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs