From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1AKaEbw074280 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:36:14 -0600 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3E7981912066 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:35:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.190]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id vDYr3hyVGgnZuUhE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:35:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a6so23541tib.18 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:35:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4991E508.7000303@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:35:20 +1100 From: Mark Goodwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: XFS Documentation References: <1232480744.23291.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090128202715.GR16689@sgi.com> <1233175168.25011.155.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090204183603.GA26714@sgi.com> <4989F4C2.3030305@sgi.com> <20090205112906.GB11781@infradead.org> <498D8F18.3080903@thebarn.com> <498F7861.6010109@sgi.com> <498F7E71.8040600@xfs.org> <498FD62D.9010604@sgi.com> <20090210180948.GA18457@infradead.org> <4991C670.5010409@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4991C670.5010409@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: SGI Engineering Interfaces to Red Hat , Marizol Martinez , Tony Ernst , George Beshers , John Hesterberg , xfs-oss , Christoph Hellwig , Russell Cattelan , xfs-dev , Gary Hagensen , Ric Wheeler Eric Sandeen wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:07:25PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote: >>>> That's cool, I'll change the web site to point to the new repo >>>> once you have it fixed up. >>>> Just trying to keep the clutter down. >>> Ok, done >> So now we have the old xfsdocs repo replaced by what essentially be >> xfsweb. >> >> I think we should have a clean repo for the document sources somewhere, >> not intermindlged with the more or less dead website.. >> > > I agree. > > -Eric OK, I put it back how I had it set up originally. -- Mark _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs