From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1BHQTdC143748 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:26:29 -0600 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D6AA115D2B4E for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:25:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fyxJutaeGmWIYXJH for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:25:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49930A1B.7010905@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:25:47 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: rfc 1/2: specfile: use rpm macros where possible References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Jan Engelhardt wrote: > parent d8a0f148be5b5ea67ee84c61201e98d345c14eda (v{3.0.0}) > commit c32f9b41de79a420e0896d2d4321ce74235d26ce > Author: Jan Engelhardt > Date: Wed Feb 11 17:52:53 2009 +0100 > > specfile: use rpm macros where possible > > This way less places need to be changes (when a developer decides > to change it..) after the placeholders have been substituted. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt > --- Fine by me, though I never use the specfile (who does?) I figure most distros have their own specfile to accomodate distro-specific policies, macros, etc. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs