public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: raksac@yahoo.com
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:56:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4994FD8C.5020303@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3453.33822.qm@web30203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

raksac@yahoo.com wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Thank you for taking the time to write. Having said
> where I stand and we are kind of on the same page. Is
> there something I can expect which would put me on a
> track of nailing down the problem. It maybe a wild
> goose chase but something that I can start with would
> be much appreciated.

Just random debugging thoughts...

Try stock 2.6.28.4, to see if you have the same problem.  If so, and
esp. if you also see it on 2.6.29, then you'll get a lot more attention
here.  :)

If not, then it's something with your backport most likely.  Figure out
what you had to backport and see if it's possibly causing the error(s).

If it's locked up, try sysrq-w (echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger) and look
at dmesg to see if other threads are locked against it.  Figure out why.

On the oops try memory debugging etc, see if you're referencing freed
memory, using corrupt lists, etc.

Look for other errors in the logs prior to this.

See if your filesystem is corrupted.

Bug Red Hat for XFS support, assuming you're actually buying RHEL5
support from them.  :)

> Unfortunately there is no distro which gets closer to
> where mainline lives today. Reading the changelog
> there are several problems that I have already come
> across and has convincingly driven me to take on this
> task.

well certainly there are distros with kernels newer than 2.6.18, but it
depends on your needs & goals I guess.

Good luck,
-Eric

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-13  4:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-11  7:16 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! raksac
2009-02-11  9:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-02-11 23:33   ` raksac
2009-02-11 23:36     ` Justin Piszcz
2009-02-12  9:22       ` raksac
2009-02-12 21:55         ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-12 21:59           ` raksac
2009-02-12 22:10             ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-12 22:16               ` raksac
2009-02-13  4:56                 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-02-19  8:04                   ` raksac
2009-02-13  9:32                 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-11 23:34   ` raksac
2009-02-12 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-12 21:55   ` raksac
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-11  7:57 Rakesh
     [not found] <20060717125216.GA15481@planetzork.ping.de>
     [not found] ` <1153146608.1218.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2006-07-17 14:48   ` Jochen Heuer
2006-07-21 22:53     ` Jochen Heuer
2006-07-21 22:58   ` Jochen Heuer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4994FD8C.5020303@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=raksac@yahoo.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox