From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1DEEBdn184570 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:14:11 -0600 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 546A2192D08F for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ebXSR8NhXYaGLABB for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:13:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49957FBB.40900@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:12:11 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_fsr not defragmenting: 'could not open tmp file' References: <283651.13069.qm@web51408.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <200902131014.59183@zmi.at> In-Reply-To: <200902131014.59183@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Michael Monnerie Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Freitag 13 Februar 2009 Richard Troxell wrote: >> xfs_fsr is coming from xfsprogs 3.0.0 >> Linux kernel is 2.6.23.9 >> Architecture is x86_64, but xfs_fsr is 32bit. > > I'm not a dev, but I'd suggest trying the newest 2.6.28 kernel and see > if the problem persists. There have been many fixes since your kernel. > > mfg zmi Actually, yes. there were 32/64 issues until recently, and fsr was in fact using an ioctl that did not have a 32-bit handler. These weren't fixed until 2.6.29-rc1. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs