From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1G0sIOH108052 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:54:18 -0600 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0F5D712399D for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:53:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.190]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id grNHL6m8s9oFpk6t for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:53:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a6so1508908tib.18 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:53:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4998B90B.1000605@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:53:31 +1100 From: Mark Goodwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group References: <20090214164245.GD19813@infradead.org> <49972260.4000702@sandeen.net> <20090215182153.GA31179@infradead.org> <49986233.6050600@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <49986233.6050600@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com Eric Sandeen wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Most are probably close enough, but 178 looks nasty - seems to be >>> xfs_repair that's taking so long. These are running on 100G partitions, >>> though :) >> 178 only takes 16 seconds for me, running on 10G partitions. > > interesting that a 10x size growth makes a 22x time growth. > It would be interesting to see if Barry's "memory optimization" patches (that I posted) improve the linearity here. Cheers -- Mark _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs