From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1G1mXVH110495 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:48:33 -0600 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9499612380F for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:47:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7TIU1WswDowwP7hQ for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:47:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4998C5C5.2080003@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:47:49 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add "quick" group References: <20090214164245.GD19813@infradead.org> <49972260.4000702@sandeen.net> <20090215182153.GA31179@infradead.org> <49986233.6050600@sandeen.net> <4998B90B.1000605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4998B90B.1000605@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Goodwin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com Mark Goodwin wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> Most are probably close enough, but 178 looks nasty - seems to be >>>> xfs_repair that's taking so long. These are running on 100G partitions, >>>> though :) >>> 178 only takes 16 seconds for me, running on 10G partitions. >> interesting that a 10x size growth makes a 22x time growth. >> > > It would be interesting to see if Barry's "memory optimization" > patches (that I posted) improve the linearity here. > > Cheers > -- Mark > I'll have to try it :) (of course it was on totally different hardware, too... but worth checking out) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs