From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2LMDLXR018616 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:13:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B9F3D1C5E751 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id HlHQebxiUSLAirWn for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49C56650.10008@sandeen.net> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:12:32 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: kill ino64 mount option References: <20090318094119.561416000@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090318094132.076764000@bombadil.infradead.org> <49C4650B.4040509@sandeen.net> <20090321200806.GA15245@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090321200806.GA15245@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:54:51PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >>> The ino64 mount option adds a fixed offset to 32bit inode numbers >>> to bring them into the 64bit range. There's no need for this kind >>> of debug tool given that it's easy to produce real 64bit inode numbers >>> for testing. >> hm, easy how? > > Actually test with a large enough device and let them spread evenly > over the AGs. It's the large-enough device which sometimes is at odds with "easy" -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs