From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n3HGrBKv148200 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:53:22 -0500 Message-ID: <49E8B36E.1080508@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:50:54 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS support for TRIM / blkdev_issue_discard? References: <20090331053013.7642414167108@attica.americas.sgi.com> <49E4A131.5040309@isg.de> <49E8A9C8.5030705@isg.de> In-Reply-To: <49E8A9C8.5030705@isg.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Peter Niemayer Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Peter Niemayer wrote: > Update: In a recent forum entry > ( http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54379&page=11 ) > Mark Lord (the maintainer of the "hdparm" tool) states that according > to his tests the newly added support for discarding sectors works in > the Linux "ext4" filesystem. > (Support in GFS2 and swap filesystems has already been available before). > > Isn't that another good reason enable XFS to do that, too? :-) I don't think anyone disagrees that it's a good idea; it's a question of resources and priorities, is all. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs