Re: getting changes (fixes or enhancements) to xfs-tools

[Klaus Strebel <klaus.strebel@gmx.net>]

Linda A. Walsh schrieb:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
>>>     I understand you want people to see the work that has gone into
>>> the
>>> kernel, but telling someone to search through 1327 entries just to
>>> find
>>> an answer of 'no', seems a bit ...something.
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/
>>     fs/xfs/xfsdump-dev.git
>>     fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev.git
>>     fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git
>>     fs/xfs/dmapi-dev.git
> ---
>     Those are files from the actual utilities?  I.e. the
> source code for the utilities is stored in the kernel tree?  That the
> support routines for the utilities have changes doesn't imply that
> one would expect to find source-changes for the utils there unless
> the utils are in the kernel tree -- but I don't think so(?)  Like the
> 'util-linux' utils, I have the impression they are stored outside of
> the kernel tree.
>
>     No need to answer to tell me the util sources are not stored
> in the kernel (if that's the case), as that's my current "world view" 
> :-).
> But if I need to update my current world view (again), I hope you'll
> _gently_ let me know. :-)
>
Hi Linda,

your misunderstanding, git.kernel.org is a site where several git 
repositories are hosted, no the kernel source tree ;-). The 
fs/xfs/xxx.git is the path of the git-repository of the xfs-tools, i 
doesn't mean it's in the kernel source in the directory fs/xfs ...
Even the sources for ext2 ( 3, 4 ), btrfs, jfs, reiserfs et al. are not 
part of the Linux source tree, so what made you thinking that?

Cheers
Klaus

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs