From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n3K314ds022364 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:01:04 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2F71D1CD1182 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CTTldFx7CWDGn0a0 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49EBE56A.1070906@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:00:58 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] put xfs build features into the stats file References: <1520890652.3597921240196368192.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: <1520890652.3597921240196368192.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Nathan Scott Cc: xfs-oss Nathan Scott wrote: > Separate file? That line uses a comma separator ... differs to > every other line in that stats file, painful for parsers. And > no risk of breaking anything if its a separate file. > > cheers. Hm good point. Might do; not that big a deal, just wanted to be able to gracefully skip acl/attr xfstests if the xfs build didn't support it :) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs