From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n3MJNBYv220175 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:23:11 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9D7521CDD1BD for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Ztb6X0QThFTmNMmS for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49EF6E93.1050204@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:22:59 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: enforce lazy-count=0 in log tests 018, 081, 082 References: <49EE28EA.4010409@sandeen.net> <20090422191226.GB3709@josefsipek.net> In-Reply-To: <20090422191226.GB3709@josefsipek.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek Cc: xfs mailing list Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:13:30PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> I was experimenting w/ default lazy-count=1, and it broke a few tests. >> Seems simplest to enforce lazy-count=0 in the common.log routines >> for now, and fix up the output? (vs. updating all the expected >> output for these tests...) >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > > Hrm...are there any tests that explicitly check lazy-count=1? not that I know of, but you can set it in MKFS_OPTIONS or something like that, IIRC. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs