From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n3NHQWaf017246 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:26:32 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C24921444D82 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id m8flt30SkTv0v1qE for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49F0A485.8060408@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:25:25 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add aio-dio-regress tests References: <49EFB75B.5030700@sandeen.net> <20090423171937.GE11391@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090423171937.GE11391@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs-oss Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:33:31PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Think it's worth pulling this in? >> Also not sure where to put it, under the top dir or under src ... >> >> Takes about 250s to run them all. Could break out the longer >> one into a separate test so the rest could be in quick. > > I would prefer to have a separate test for each of the programs. Fine by me. Any thoughts on if this should live under src/ or not? I'm not sure why ltp/ doesn't, but I was just following that. Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs