[PATCH] xfstests: fix 130, 132 for inifinitely-fast disks

[PATCH] xfstests: fix 130, 132 for inifinitely-fast disks

[Eric Sandeen]

Due to the new quantum/holographic storage I'm testing, my 
disks go infinitely fast, thereby breaking some filters:

-XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
+3 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (inf EiB/sec and inf ops/sec)

I'm no regexp expert but I think the below change will fix it.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
---

diff --git a/130 b/130
index f287d20..b0bbe73 100755
--- a/130
+++ b/130
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ common_line_filter()
 
 _filter_xfs_io()
 {
-    common_line_filter | sed -e "s/[0-9/.]* [GMKiBbytes]*, [0-9]* ops\; [0-9/:. sec]* ([0-9/.]* [GMKiBbytes]*\/sec and [0-9/.]* ops\/sec)/XXX Bytes, X ops\; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY\/sec and XXX ops\/sec)/"
+    common_line_filter | sed -e "s/[0-9/.]* [GMKiBbytes]*, [0-9]* ops\; [0-9/:. sec]* ([inf0-9/.]* [EPGMKiBbytes]*\/sec and [inf0-9/.]* ops\/sec)/XXX Bytes, X ops\; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY\/sec and XXX ops\/sec)/"
 }
 
 # real QA test starts here
diff --git a/132 b/132
index df3d3d3..f373256 100755
--- a/132
+++ b/132
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ common_line_filter()
 
 _filter_xfs_io()
 {
-    common_line_filter | sed -e "s/[0-9/.]* [GMKiBbytes]*, [0-9]* ops\; [0-9/:. sec]* ([0-9/.]* [GMKiBbytes]*\/sec and [0-9/.]* ops\/sec)/XXX Bytes, X ops\; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY\/sec and XXX ops\/sec)/"
+    common_line_filter | sed -e "s/[0-9/.]* [GMKiBbytes]*, [0-9]* ops\; [0-9/:. sec]* ([inf0-9/.]* [EPGMKiBbytes]*\/sec and [inf0-9/.]* ops\/sec)/XXX Bytes, X ops\; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY\/sec and XXX ops\/sec)/"
 }
 
 # real QA test starts here

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix 130, 132 for inifinitely-fast disks

[Josef 'Jeff' Sipek]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:29:13PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Due to the new quantum/holographic storage I'm testing, my 
> disks go infinitely fast, thereby breaking some filters:

If you want, send me those drives, and I'll test them for you ;)

> -XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +3 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (inf EiB/sec and inf ops/sec)
> 
> I'm no regexp expert but I think the below change will fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>

Yep, that'll do it.

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.

-- 
What is the difference between Mechanical Engineers and Civil Engineers?
Mechanical Engineers build weapons, Civil Engineers build targets.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix 130, 132 for inifinitely-fast disks

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:29:13PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Due to the new quantum/holographic storage I'm testing, my 
> disks go infinitely fast, thereby breaking some filters:
> 
> -XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +3 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (inf EiB/sec and inf ops/sec)
> 
> I'm no regexp expert but I think the below change will fix it.

Looks good to me.  I used to see this too when running xfsqa under qemu
(with really fast disk (=host pagecache) and a really slow cpu..

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs