From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n44EsOXH179271 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 09:54:24 -0500 Received: from estes.americas.sgi.com (estes.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.10]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73A1AC00E for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49FF019B.5050207@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:54:19 -0500 From: Bill Kendall MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: add .gitignore References: <20090429135050.GC30808@infradead.org> <20090504074021.GA29449@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090504074021.GA29449@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Timothy Shimmin Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:35:39AM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: >> Get rid of the symlinked files by creating a local library for the >> commonality? ;-)Probably easier said than done - I haven't looked at the >> code in a while - but I >> I think the traditional library model is better than a heap of symlinks :) > > It probably is. I'll put it on my todo list.. Not sure how well if fits the library model, unfortunately. The symlinked files need to be compiled for dump and then recompiled for restore as there's a bunch of #ifdef DUMP and #ifdef RESTORE sections. I guess two libraries could be created, if separate build dirs were used under common. Bill _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs