From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n48ChqgW016859 for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 07:43:52 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C97CF1D1CAFE for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Gbhkq7jltxlZhlby for ; Fri, 08 May 2009 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A04290B.7020309@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 07:43:55 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 042: point xfs_fsr right at the fragmented file References: <4A0386FD.7000108@sandeen.net> <20090508062658.GA1689@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090508062658.GA1689@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs-oss Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:12:29PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Somehow 042 as it stands isn't actually defragging the fragmented >> file we created (see 042.full post-run) >> >> Probably need to look into that as well, but for now this should >> make the call to fsr actually _do_ something. >> >> This has let 2 fsr bugs slip through qa in the past few months. :( > > Looks good. Can you open a bugzilla for the problem of fsr not actually > finding the fragmented file so that we don't forget about that one? > Good idea and done: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=821 -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs