* xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
@ 2009-05-23 15:01 Richard Ems
2009-05-23 15:50 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Ems @ 2009-05-23 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
Hi list,
I'm getting the error "xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed:
Invalid argument" while trying to grow an XFS partition.
This is on openSUSE 11.1 64 bit, with xfsprogs-2.10.2-3.1 from
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/filesystems/openSUSE_11.1/x86_64/xfsprogs-2.10.2-3.1.x86_64.rpm
.
This error is the same or looks similar to the one reported some months
ago at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00028.html .
There is apparently a fix for it, see
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01794.html :
*********************************************************
commit 471d59103167c84f17b9bcfee22ed10b44ff206e
Author: sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Nov 25 21:20:10 2008 -0600
[XFS] Add compat handlers for data & rt growfs ioctls
The args for XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA and XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSRTA
have padding on the end on intel, so add arg copyin functions,
and then just call the growfs ioctl helpers.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
*********************************************************
I tried different 2.6.27 versions, one 2.6.29 and one 2.6.30-rc6
version, all gave the same error, check
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506361 for the different
kernel versions and errors.
Is this fix still not included in Linus / openSUSE trees?
Or am I hitting another error?
Thanks, Richard
--
Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com
Cape Horn Engineering S.L.
C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso
46011 Valencia
Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924
http://www.cape-horn-eng.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 15:01 xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument Richard Ems
@ 2009-05-23 15:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-23 16:07 ` richard.ems
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-23 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Ems; +Cc: xfs
Richard Ems wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm getting the error "xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed:
> Invalid argument" while trying to grow an XFS partition.
>
> This is on openSUSE 11.1 64 bit, with xfsprogs-2.10.2-3.1 from
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/filesystems/openSUSE_11.1/x86_64/xfsprogs-2.10.2-3.1.x86_64.rpm
The compat handlers should only matter if you're using 32 bit userspace
with a 64 bit kernel...
Are you certain that your xfsprogs userspace is 64-bit?
>
> This error is the same or looks similar to the one reported some months
> ago at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00028.html .
>
> There is apparently a fix for it, see
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01794.html :
>
> *********************************************************
> commit 471d59103167c84f17b9bcfee22ed10b44ff206e
> Author: sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Nov 25 21:20:10 2008 -0600
>
> [XFS] Add compat handlers for data & rt growfs ioctls
>
> The args for XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA and XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSRTA
> have padding on the end on intel, so add arg copyin functions,
> and then just call the growfs ioctl helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
> *********************************************************
>
> I tried different 2.6.27 versions, one 2.6.29 and one 2.6.30-rc6
> version, all gave the same error, check
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506361 for the different
> kernel versions and errors.
I don't see in that bug where you tested .29 or .30, or what the results
were...
> Is this fix still not included in Linus / openSUSE trees?
As for Linus' tree, AFAIK everything works; I can't speak to what SuSE has.
-Eric
> Or am I hitting another error?
>
> Thanks, Richard
>
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 15:50 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-05-23 16:07 ` richard.ems
2009-05-23 17:35 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: richard.ems @ 2009-05-23 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
Quoting Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>:
> Richard Ems wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm getting the error "xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed:
>> Invalid argument" while trying to grow an XFS partition.
>>
>> This is on openSUSE 11.1 64 bit, with xfsprogs-2.10.2-3.1 from
>> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/filesystems/openSUSE_11.1/x86_64/xfsprogs-2.10.2-3.1.x86_64.rpm
>
> The compat handlers should only matter if you're using 32 bit userspace
> with a 64 bit kernel...
>
> Are you certain that your xfsprogs userspace is 64-bit?
Yes.
c3m:~ # type -a xfs_growfs
xfs_growfs is /usr/sbin/xfs_growfs
c3m:~ # file /usr/sbin/xfs_growfs
/usr/sbin/xfs_growfs: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.4, dynamically linked (uses shared libs),
not stripped
>
>>
>> This error is the same or looks similar to the one reported some months
>> ago at http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00028.html .
>>
>> There is apparently a fix for it, see
>> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01794.html :
>>
>> *********************************************************
>> commit 471d59103167c84f17b9bcfee22ed10b44ff206e
>> Author: sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue Nov 25 21:20:10 2008 -0600
>>
>> [XFS] Add compat handlers for data & rt growfs ioctls
>>
>> The args for XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA and XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSRTA
>> have padding on the end on intel, so add arg copyin functions,
>> and then just call the growfs ioctl helpers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
>> *********************************************************
>>
>> I tried different 2.6.27 versions, one 2.6.29 and one 2.6.30-rc6
>> version, all gave the same error, check
>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506361 for the different
>> kernel versions and errors.
>
> I don't see in that bug where you tested .29 or .30, or what the results
> were...
Sorry, I wrote a 2nd comment into bugzilla but forgot to submit it 8( .
Now it's there, please check again (
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506361#c1 ) .
>
>
>> Is this fix still not included in Linus / openSUSE trees?
>
> As for Linus' tree, AFAIK everything works; I can't speak to what SuSE has.
So the Vanilla kernel I tried should have this fix included, is it
then a new bug?
Thanks, Richard
--
Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com
Cape Horn Engineering S.L.
C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso
46011 Valencia
Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924
http://www.cape-horn-eng.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 16:07 ` richard.ems
@ 2009-05-23 17:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-23 17:45 ` richard.ems
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-23 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: richard.ems; +Cc: xfs
richard.ems@cape-horn-eng.com wrote:
> Quoting Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>:
>
>> Richard Ems wrote:
...
>>> I tried different 2.6.27 versions, one 2.6.29 and one 2.6.30-rc6
>>> version, all gave the same error, check
>>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506361 for the different
>>> kernel versions and errors.
>> I don't see in that bug where you tested .29 or .30, or what the results
>> were...
>
> Sorry, I wrote a 2nd comment into bugzilla but forgot to submit it 8( .
> Now it's there, please check again (
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506361#c1 ) .
>
>>
>>> Is this fix still not included in Linus / openSUSE trees?
>> As for Linus' tree, AFAIK everything works; I can't speak to what SuSE has.
>
> So the Vanilla kernel I tried should have this fix included, is it
> then a new bug?
Not sure ... how big is the current fs and how big is the device? Can
you provide:
# xfs_info /mnt
# grep sda1 /proc/partitions
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 17:35 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-05-23 17:45 ` richard.ems
2009-05-23 18:47 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: richard.ems @ 2009-05-23 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
Quoting Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>:
> Not sure ... how big is the current fs and how big is the device? Can
> you provide:
>
> # xfs_info /mnt
> # grep sda1 /proc/partitions
It is a 16TB FS, and I add 4 x 1 TB HDDs to the RAID 6 array, so the
device went from 16 TB to 20 TB.
c3m:~ # xfs_info /backup/IFT
meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=256 agcount=52, agsize=76288719 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=1
data = bsize=4096 blocks=3905982455, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
c3m:~ # grep sda1 /proc/partitions
8 1 19529912286 sda1
c3m:~ # parted /dev/sda print
Model: IFT A24U-G2421 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 20.0TB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 17.4kB 20.0TB 20.0TB xfs LD01 , , , , , , , , , , ,
thanks, Richard
--
Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com
Cape Horn Engineering S.L.
C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso
46011 Valencia
Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924
http://www.cape-horn-eng.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 17:45 ` richard.ems
@ 2009-05-23 18:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-23 19:25 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-23 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: richard.ems; +Cc: xfs
richard.ems@cape-horn-eng.com wrote:
> Quoting Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>:
>> Not sure ... how big is the current fs and how big is the device? Can
>> you provide:
>>
>> # xfs_info /mnt
>> # grep sda1 /proc/partitions
>
> It is a 16TB FS, and I add 4 x 1 TB HDDs to the RAID 6 array, so the
> device went from 16 TB to 20 TB.
>
> c3m:~ # xfs_info /backup/IFT
> meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=256 agcount=52, agsize=76288719 blks
> = sectsz=512 attr=1
> data = bsize=4096 blocks=3905982455, imaxpct=25
> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1
> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>
>
> c3m:~ # grep sda1 /proc/partitions
> 8 1 19529912286 sda1
thanks, with that info I can reproduce it, I'll look into it soon... but
not today.
# xfs_io -f -c "truncate 19998630180864" fsfile
# mkfs.xfs -f -bsize=4096 -dagsize=76288719b,size=3905982455b fsfile
# mount -o loop fsfile mnt/
# xfs_growfs mnt/
meta-data=/dev/loop0 isize=256 agcount=52,
agsize=76288719 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=3905982455, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 18:47 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-05-23 19:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-25 9:54 ` Richard Ems
2009-06-01 14:32 ` Richard Ems
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-05-23 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: richard.ems; +Cc: xfs
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> richard.ems@cape-horn-eng.com wrote:
>> Quoting Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>:
>>> Not sure ... how big is the current fs and how big is the device? Can
>>> you provide:
>>>
>>> # xfs_info /mnt
>>> # grep sda1 /proc/partitions
>> It is a 16TB FS, and I add 4 x 1 TB HDDs to the RAID 6 array, so the
>> device went from 16 TB to 20 TB.
>>
>> c3m:~ # xfs_info /backup/IFT
>> meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=256 agcount=52, agsize=76288719 blks
>> = sectsz=512 attr=1
>> data = bsize=4096 blocks=3905982455, imaxpct=25
>> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
>> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
>> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1
>> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
>> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>>
>>
>> c3m:~ # grep sda1 /proc/partitions
>> 8 1 19529912286 sda1
>
> thanks, with that info I can reproduce it, I'll look into it soon... but
> not today.
Actually I lied, I looked at it ;)
if you growfs to a nr of blocks that is about 55 blocks less than the
actual device size, it should succeed for you. There's a case where the
last AG would be too small and it tries to compensate but there's an
overflow, I'll send a patch.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 19:25 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-05-25 9:54 ` Richard Ems
2009-06-01 14:32 ` Richard Ems
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Ems @ 2009-05-25 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> if you growfs to a nr of blocks that is about 55 blocks less than the
> actual device size, it should succeed for you. There's a case where the
> last AG would be too small and it tries to compensate but there's an
> overflow, I'll send a patch.
Many thanks Eric for looking, finding and fixing it! 8)
I will try to growfs to less than 55 blocks than the device as you proposed.
Thanks again, Richard
--
Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com
Cape Horn Engineering S.L.
C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso
46011 Valencia
Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924
http://www.cape-horn-eng.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument
2009-05-23 19:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-25 9:54 ` Richard Ems
@ 2009-06-01 14:32 ` Richard Ems
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Ems @ 2009-06-01 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> if you growfs to a nr of blocks that is about 55 blocks less than the
> actual device size, it should succeed for you. There's a case where the
> last AG would be too small and it tries to compensate but there's an
> overflow, I'll send a patch.
Yes, it worked growing to a smaller size.
Thanks again, Richard
--
Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com
Cape Horn Engineering S.L.
C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso
46011 Valencia
Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924
http://www.cape-horn-eng.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-01 14:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-23 15:01 xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument Richard Ems
2009-05-23 15:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-23 16:07 ` richard.ems
2009-05-23 17:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-23 17:45 ` richard.ems
2009-05-23 18:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-23 19:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-25 9:54 ` Richard Ems
2009-06-01 14:32 ` Richard Ems
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox