public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_reclaim_inodes
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:44:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1DA622.3050900@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090514171558.649403000@bombadil.infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
>
> The noblock parameter of xfs_reclaim_inodes is only ever set to zero. Remove
> it and all the conditional code that is never executed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>

> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-05-14 16:20:34.251688779 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-05-14 16:20:37.012658983 +0200
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ xfs_quiesce_fs(
>  	int	count = 0, pincount;
>  
>  	xfs_flush_buftarg(mp->m_ddev_targp, 0);
> -	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
> +	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This loop must run at least twice.  The first instance of the loop
> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ xfs_sync_worker(
>  
>  	if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)) {
>  		xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE);
> -		xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
> +		xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_ASYNC);
>  		/* dgc: errors ignored here */
>  		error = xfs_qm_sync(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
>  		error = xfs_sync_fsdata(mp, SYNC_BDFLUSH);
> @@ -701,7 +701,6 @@ STATIC void
>  xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
>  	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
>  	int		ag,
> -	int		noblock,
>  	int		mode)
>  {
>  	xfs_inode_t	*ip = NULL;
> @@ -747,25 +746,13 @@ restart:
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (noblock) {
> -			if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) {
> -				read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -			if (xfs_ipincount(ip) ||
> -			    !xfs_iflock_nowait(ip)) {
> -				xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> -				read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -		}
>  		read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * hmmm - this is an inode already in reclaim. Do
>  		 * we even bother catching it here?
>  		 */
> -		if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, noblock, mode))
> +		if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, 0, mode))
>  			skipped++;
>  	} while (nr_found);
>  
> @@ -780,7 +767,6 @@ restart:
>  int
>  xfs_reclaim_inodes(
>  	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
> -	int		 noblock,
>  	int		mode)
>  {
>  	int		i;
> @@ -788,7 +774,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes(
>  	for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++) {
>  		if (!mp->m_perag[i].pag_ici_init)
>  			continue;
> -		xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, noblock, mode);
> +		xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, mode);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h	2009-05-14 16:19:44.268809697 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h	2009-05-14 16:20:37.012658983 +0200
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void xfs_quiesce_attr(struct xfs_mount *
>  void xfs_flush_inodes(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  
>  int xfs_reclaim_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip, int locked, int sync_mode);
> -int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int noblock, int mode);
> +int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int mode);
>  
>  void xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>  void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c	2009-05-14 16:19:44.318659340 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c	2009-05-14 16:20:37.013659110 +0200
> @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ xfs_unmountfs(
>  	 * need to force the log first.
>  	 */
>  	xfs_log_force(mp, (xfs_lsn_t)0, XFS_LOG_FORCE | XFS_LOG_SYNC);
> -	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, 0, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
> +	xfs_reclaim_inodes(mp, XFS_IFLUSH_ASYNC);
>  
>  	xfs_qm_unmount(mp);

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-27 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-14 17:12 [PATCH 0/7] inode sync refactoring Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: split inode data writeback from xfs_sync_inodes_ag Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15  4:49   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-15 17:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-18  6:58       ` Dave Chinner
2009-05-26 20:14   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: split inode flushing " Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15  4:52   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-15 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-26 20:45   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-27 10:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: factor out inode validation for sync Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:38   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_reclaim_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:44   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: introduce a per-ag inode iterator Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 22:01   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-04 11:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 22:18   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-04 17:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 18:18       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: use generic inode iterator in xfs_qm_dqrele_all_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:29   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-05 19:15   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 19:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: split xfs_sync_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:26   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-04 10:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:32   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 8/7] xfs: remove SYNC_IOWAIT Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:30   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-04 10:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:37   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 9/7] xfs: remove SYNC_BDFLUSH Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-29 13:19   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-29 20:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-30  8:27       ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-06-05 20:45   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A1DA622.3050900@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox