From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n57IROSO183408 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:27:25 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 61EDB2DA882 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EcEcQS9Fdr2uInYX for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A2C0698.9060800@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:27:36 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Kernel crash with 2.6.29 + nfs + xfs (radix-tree) References: <20090520003745.GA27491@samad.com.au> <20090604112657.GA10738@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Martin Spott Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Martin Spott wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> Sorry guys, still haven't been able to track it down. Any chance one >> of you could run with CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG enabled and see if it trips >> over any of the asserts? > > "Say N unless you are an XFS developer, or you play one on TV." > > Very nice ;-) > > I'm have to regret that I'm neither an XFS developer nor do I pretend > to be one. Yet, as I understand, I should see at least _some_ debug > info via 'dmesg', if there is any. CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is more of addded checks and asserts, not so much in the way of extra messages - at least, until you actually hit a problem. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs