From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n58GQir3237587 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:26:44 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 08FE5148FE84 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id owQAn5u7wXs88FSY for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A2D3BCC.2010000@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:26:52 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Allow fsx tests to run on generic filesystems References: <4A2D31E3.3090108@sandeen.net> <20090608161646.GA14861@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090608161646.GA14861@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs mailing list Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:44:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> There is already logic in 075 to gracefully skip nfs for fsx >> invocations with -x (xfs-specific preallocation) - just extend >> this to any non-xfs filesystem, and add to test 112 as well. >> >> Later we can change this behavior to use fallocate and include >> more filesystems but this gets some fsx coverage for now. >> >> Test 127 doesn't seem to have anything xfs-specific, so mark >> that as generic too. > > Good bandaid for now, but it would be even better to get a fsx > version using the generic prealloc calls one day :) Will do after we're done w/ the planned fsx gyrations.... -Eric > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs