From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n59GcMc0047610 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:38:22 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B65AD2E247B for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7ujRjw6VDufN7nQu for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A2E900B.3070100@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:38:35 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block References: <4A2C8AD8.9030107@sandeen.net> <20090608074230.GA28066@infradead.org> <20090609160622.GE63930@magus.portal.sigil.org> In-Reply-To: <20090609160622.GE63930@magus.portal.sigil.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Richard Kolkovich Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Richard Kolkovich wrote: > Guys, > > After applying the patch, we get much further. xfs_repair then fails in phase 7: > > > xfs_repair: phase7.c:47: set_nlinks: Assertion `fs_inode_nlink' failed. > > Aborted > > > Any ideas on that one? Thanks! Yep, I meant to reply, I hit that one too. Haven't yet looked into that one .... -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs