public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
	Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:31:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3D0EC5.8080308@news-service.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7028E3E6-033A-416D-B046-286520CA457A@sandeen.net>

Just had another one. It's likely we'll have to downgrade to 2.6.28.x.

These servers have 28 SCSI disks mounted separately (JBOD). The workload 
is basically i/o load (90% read, 10% write) from these disks. The 
servers are not extreme busy (overloaded).

xfs_info from a random disk:

sb02:~# xfs_info /dev/sdb
meta-data=/dev/sdb               isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=18310547 
blks
          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=73242187, imaxpct=25
          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=2
          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

As you can see we use lazy-count=1. Mount options aren't very exotic: 
rw,noatime,nodiratime

We are seeing these panic's on at least 3 different servers.

If you have any hints on how to investigate, we would greatly appreciate 
it.

-Patrick

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Others aren't hitting this, what sort of workload are you running when 
> you hit it?
> 
> I have not had time to look at it yet but some sort of testcase may 
> greatly help.
> 
> -Eric
> 
> On Jun 20, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Unfortunately another panic. See attachment.
>>
>> Would love to receive some advice on this issue.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We are experiencing kernel panics on servers running 2.6.29(.1) and 
>>>>> 2.6.30. I've included two attachments to demonstrate.
>>>>>
>>>>> The error is:
>>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim ...
>>>>>
>>>>> OS is 64bit Debian lenny.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a known issue? Any comments on this?
>>>>
>>>> It's not known to me, was this a recent upgrade?  (IOW, did it start
>>>> with .29(.1)?
>>> We've seen this on 2 separate servers. It probably happened more 
>>> often, but we didn't captured the panic message. One server was 
>>> running 2.6.29.1, the other server was running 2.6.30. Currently 
>>> we've updated all similar servers to 2.6.30.
>>> If we can provide you with more details to help fix this issue, 
>>> please let us know.
>>> -Patrick
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xfs mailing list
>>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>> <sb06-20090619.png>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-20 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-17 17:04 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-17 21:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-18  7:55   ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-20 10:18     ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-20 13:29       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-20 16:31         ` Patrick Schreurs [this message]
2009-06-23  7:24           ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-23  8:17             ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-06-23 17:13               ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-30 20:13                 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-30 20:42                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-20 19:19                     ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-07-20 20:14                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-01 12:44                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-02  7:09                     ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-07-02 17:31                     ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-07-21 14:12                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-22  8:55                         ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-08-17 21:14                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-20 12:24                             ` Tommy van Leeuwen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A3D0EC5.8080308@news-service.com \
    --to=patrick@news-service.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=tommy@news-service.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox