From: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:31:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3D0EC5.8080308@news-service.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7028E3E6-033A-416D-B046-286520CA457A@sandeen.net>
Just had another one. It's likely we'll have to downgrade to 2.6.28.x.
These servers have 28 SCSI disks mounted separately (JBOD). The workload
is basically i/o load (90% read, 10% write) from these disks. The
servers are not extreme busy (overloaded).
xfs_info from a random disk:
sb02:~# xfs_info /dev/sdb
meta-data=/dev/sdb isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=18310547
blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=73242187, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
As you can see we use lazy-count=1. Mount options aren't very exotic:
rw,noatime,nodiratime
We are seeing these panic's on at least 3 different servers.
If you have any hints on how to investigate, we would greatly appreciate
it.
-Patrick
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Others aren't hitting this, what sort of workload are you running when
> you hit it?
>
> I have not had time to look at it yet but some sort of testcase may
> greatly help.
>
> -Eric
>
> On Jun 20, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately another panic. See attachment.
>>
>> Would love to receive some advice on this issue.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> Patrick Schreurs wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We are experiencing kernel panics on servers running 2.6.29(.1) and
>>>>> 2.6.30. I've included two attachments to demonstrate.
>>>>>
>>>>> The error is:
>>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim ...
>>>>>
>>>>> OS is 64bit Debian lenny.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a known issue? Any comments on this?
>>>>
>>>> It's not known to me, was this a recent upgrade? (IOW, did it start
>>>> with .29(.1)?
>>> We've seen this on 2 separate servers. It probably happened more
>>> often, but we didn't captured the panic message. One server was
>>> running 2.6.29.1, the other server was running 2.6.30. Currently
>>> we've updated all similar servers to 2.6.30.
>>> If we can provide you with more details to help fix this issue,
>>> please let us know.
>>> -Patrick
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xfs mailing list
>>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>> <sb06-20090619.png>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-20 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 17:04 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-17 21:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-18 7:55 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-20 10:18 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-20 13:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-20 16:31 ` Patrick Schreurs [this message]
2009-06-23 7:24 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-23 8:17 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-06-23 17:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-30 20:13 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-30 20:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-20 19:19 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-07-20 20:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-01 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-02 7:09 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-07-02 17:31 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-07-21 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-22 8:55 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-08-17 21:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-20 12:24 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3D0EC5.8080308@news-service.com \
--to=patrick@news-service.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=tommy@news-service.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox