From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n5OMOTsP107500 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:24:30 -0500
Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4103931F1C2
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by
	cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1zBlZe1pJF4oHI4Z for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A42A7B7.3040403@sandeen.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:24:55 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs created filesystem larger than underlying device
References: <98D6DBD179F61A46AF5C064829A832A0185042D261@erebus.totalmanaged.com>
In-Reply-To: <98D6DBD179F61A46AF5C064829A832A0185042D261@erebus.totalmanaged.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Michael Moody <michael@gsc.cc>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

Michael Moody wrote:
> Hello all.
> 
>  
> 
> I recently created an XFS filesystem on an x86_64 CentOS 5.3 system. I
> used all tools in the repository:
> 
>  
> 
> Xfsprogs-2.9.4-1
> 
> Kernel 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5.centos.plus
> 
>  
> 
> It is a somewhat complex configuration of:
> 
>  
> 
> Areca RAID card with 16 1.5TB drives in a RAID 6 with 1 hotspare (100GB
> volume was created for the OS, the rest was one large volume of ~19TB)
> 
> I used pvcreate /dev/sdb to create a physical volume for LVM on the 19TB
> volume.
> 
> I then used vgcreate to create a volume group of 17.64TB
> 
> I used lvcreate to create 5 logical volumes, 4x4TB, and 1x1.5TB
> 
> On top of those logical volumes is drbd (/dev/drbd0-/dev/drbd4)
> 
> On top of the drbd volumes, I created a volume group of 17.50TB
> (/dev/drbd0-/dev/drbd4)
> 
> I created a logical volume of 17.49TB, upon which was created an xfs
> filesystem with no options (mkfs.xfs mkfs.xfs
> /dev/Volume1-Rep-Store/Volume1-Replicated -L Replicated)
> 
> The resulting filesystem is larger than the underlying logical volume:
> 
> --- Logical volume ---
> 
>   LV Name                /dev/Volume1-Rep-Store/Volume1-Replicated
>   VG Name                Volume1-Rep-Store
>   LV UUID                fB0q3f-80Kq-yFuy-NjKl-pmlW-jeiX-uEruWC
>   LV Write Access        read/write
>   LV Status              available
>   # open                 1
>   LV Size                17.49 TB
>   Current LE             4584899
>   Segments               5
>   Allocation             inherit
>   Read ahead sectors     auto
>   - currently set to     256
>   Block device           253:5
> 
> /dev/mapper/Volume1--Rep--Store-Volume1--Replicated
> 
>                        18T  411M   18T   1% /mnt/Volume1
> 
> Why is this, and how can I fix it?

I'm guessing that this is df rounding up.  Try df w/o -h, to see how
many 1k blocks you have and compare that to the size.

If it still looks wrong, can you include xfs_info output for
/mnt/Volume1 as well as the contents of /proc/partitions on your system?

I'd wager a beer that nothing is wrong, but that if something is wrong,
it's not xfs ;)

Thanks,
-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs