From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n5ON6Oh7109427 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:06:24 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B1A3F98E569 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Y3FHAT7LZBSvUB89 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A42B18B.90903@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:06:51 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: mkfs.xfs created filesystem larger than underlying device References: <98D6DBD179F61A46AF5C064829A832A0185042D261@erebus.totalmanaged.com> <4A42A7B7.3040403@sandeen.net> <98D6DBD179F61A46AF5C064829A832A0185042D264@erebus.totalmanaged.com> <4A42B087.5050205@sandeen.net> <98D6DBD179F61A46AF5C064829A832A0185042D267@erebus.totalmanaged.com> In-Reply-To: <98D6DBD179F61A46AF5C064829A832A0185042D267@erebus.totalmanaged.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Michael Moody Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Michael Moody wrote: > Are there still known issues with NFS and XFS? I'm performing the > same test against a jfs formatted filesystem (exported via NFS), and > so far, no issues. This is the latest centosplus kernel. Are there > mount options which could cause XFS to have corruption? Not that I know of. Without details about what was corrupt, what xfs_repair said, what dmesg said, what sysrq-t said, etc. it's hard to say. Could be 4k stack problems if it's x86. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs