From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n5QLqRCP229317 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:52:27 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CF45912FB8A0 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [209.173.210.139]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id y6EP1kZCHKKisHb5 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A454337.6030100@sandeen.net> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:52:55 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: corrupt file system -- "Structure needs cleaning" References: <20090626195804.GG29416@mail.physik.uni-wuppertal.de> <4A452CF7.3040807@sandeen.net> <20090626212611.GI29416@mail.physik.uni-wuppertal.de> In-Reply-To: <20090626212611.GI29416@mail.physik.uni-wuppertal.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Hendrik Hoeth Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hendrik Hoeth wrote: > Thus spake Eric Sandeen (sandeen@sandeen.net): > >>> [14:44] root@jetway:/var/log # xfs_check /dev/mapper/hda_crypt_vg-home >> xfs_check doesn't actually fix anything; I'd run xfs_repair. Use -n >> first if you want to see what it would do. > > I thought that if xfs_check doesn't show any errors, the filesystem is > fine and doesn't need an xfs_repair. Is that wrong? Well, yes, I suppose that's true. I almost never use xfs_check mostly because it's a memory hog, still, and xfs_repair checks almost everything that xfs_check does (and what isn't checked is rebuilt anyway) > Anyway xfs_repair looks healthy to me: good news, I guess :) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs