From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n6FLkSjP223533 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:46:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4C3433671A9 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:47:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MqUkgRJ6zVqEDKex for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:47:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A5E4E57.7000802@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:47:03 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: very basic defragmentation testing for xfs & ext4 References: <4A5E3A37.5050306@redhat.com> <20090715213001.GH14175@webber.adilger.int> In-Reply-To: <20090715213001.GH14175@webber.adilger.int> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Andreas Dilger Cc: Eric Sandeen , ext4 development , xfs mailing list Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jul 15, 2009 15:21 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> This test creates some files, runs defrag on them, >> and compares the before/after fragmentation as well >> as file md5sums and timestamps. >> >> (md5sums may just be reading buffered data though, >> suggestions?) > > (umount; mount)? I suppose that'd work :) -Eric > Cheers, Andreas _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs